Essay mills may offer pre-written papers on common topics or provide customized ghostwriting services. In either case, the essay mill typically licenses the paper to the student for limited use. Since the student has a license, the use of the paper is typically not considered plagiarism or even technically illegal. The license will usually only extend to one use of the essay, so any sharing or selling of a paper beyond that may constitute plagiarism or copyright infringement.
The is an essay mill. This particular essay mill is targeted at PhD students. It styles itself as a 'consultancy'. But a quick browse through the site lays the ruse bare. Clicking to the 'pricing' page reveals a raft of options for students to buy chapters of their doctorate dissertation for cold cash. Not only that, you can opt to fork over £20,000 and have them complete your entire 100,000 word thesis for you. Look here:
From essay mills, a coarse lesson on cheating - latimes
Mill says that utilitarianism can't be proven because it is impossible to prove first principles. First principles are the foundation of arguments; they are not facts that can be tested, but rather represent the system in which those facts make sense. Thus, since utilitarianism is an argument for utility as a first principle, it cannot be proven in the traditional sense. However, Mill also argues that utilitarianism can be proven in a broader sense; we do not have to arbitrarily choose first principles. Rather, it is possible to deliberate on reasons in favor and in opposition to given principles. Thus, in his essay Mill attempts to provide considerations (as opposed to proofs) in favor of utilitarianism. Mill argues that we desire the things we do because they are a means to happiness or are included in our definition of happiness. Happiness must be understood broadly, as including such general concepts as the flourishing of human culture, and the acquisition of those things that we desire. Mill says that the reader must decide for himself if this account is plausible. However, even if this account is correct, Mill does not show that people should be concerned with general happiness instead of their own. Mill simply assumes this idea, because he believes that morality must be impartial between all people. His failure to "prove" this would seem to weaken his argument, however.